Clients

The work is specific.
The identity is private.

Research for decisions where price, behaviour and imperfect information meet.

Engagement examples

Fictional briefs. No client relationships are implied.

Gambling & pricing

Does the quoted edge survive settlement?

Inputs
Timestamped odds, eligibility rules, limits and final outcomes.
Delivery
A comparable-price model, cost-adjusted expected value and a record of exclusions.

Poker & decision research

Which decisions are losing value?

Inputs
Authorised hand histories, game structure, rake and session metadata.
Delivery
Decision-level analysis, population comparisons and uncertainty by sample size.

Digital assets

What remains after execution?

Inputs
Order-book snapshots, fills, funding, network costs and settlement records.
Delivery
An execution-cost model, capacity estimates and a monitored research pipeline.

The deliverable.

Decisions, evidence and limits in one document. Identity and source-sensitive details can be removed from a public version.

Open sample research note
GW-S01 / Research noteSample — fictional

The price of a small edge.

Counterparty
Venue / source
Study window
30 days · synthetic inputs

A 2.5 percentage point change in assumed win probability produces £29,250 of additional expected value on £600,000 of modelled turnover. The result depends on the probability estimate surviving fees and execution.

Net expected return
5.775%
Incremental expected value
£29,250

Agree the boundaries first.

The engagement scope should define who can see the material, how the output may be used and what may be published. Access to a dataset is not permission for every use.

Start with the decision and a description of the available data. Confidential source files can follow once handling terms are agreed.

Discuss a question